Semester: - 3
Roll
no: - 11
Enrolment
No: - Pg14101021
Year:
- 2015-16
Paper
No: - 09
Paper
Name: -
The Modernist Literature
Topic: - “An Analysis of
Stream of consciousness Technique in ‘To the Lighthouse’ ”
Submitted
to: - Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar
University
v Introduction
Ø Biography:-
Virginia
Woolf was a popular British author born on January 25, 1882 and died on March
28, 1941. She is considered to be one of the primary figures of both Modernism
and Feminism in the twentieth century. Woolf is considered one of the most
psychological of all the Modernists; Many of her later novels take place
entirely within her characters' heads, focusing solely on the literary technique, stream of consciousness.
Virginia Woolf, one of the prominent
representatives of modernist novelist in England, has contributed significantly
to the development of modern novel in both theory and practice. She abandoned
traditional fictional devices and formulated her own distinctive techniques.
The novels of Woolf tend to be less concerned with outward reality than with
the inner life. She also takes the readers to the high glory of perception thinking. The sense of liveliness her is
depicted in this novel that how the thinking and our root of observation is
defers. Her masterpiece, To the Lighthouse, serves as an excellent sample in
analyzing Woolf’s literary theory and her experimental techniques. There is a mythical
pattern in this novel and how it is shown here and it is symbolize that makes a kind of reading of this novel. This paper is to
attempt every aspect and depict to her novel “To the Lighthouse” and to deal
with her idea about stream of consciousness literary techniques: indirect
interior monologue and free association. And also it is good to see how
Language, Subject, Self: Reading the Style of the novel.
Keywords: Virginia Woolf, To the Lighthouse,
Stream of Consciousness technique,Mythical pattern, ( An Analysis of Stream of consciousness Technique in To the Lighthouse)
It does not present objective narration,
but attempts to replicate the thoughts.Which shape the character's mind. She
wrote a novel called “To the Lighthouse” that explored the minds of the
characters using the stream of consciousness technique. This made the
characters thoughts and feelings mix into one another while the outer actions
and dialogue come second to the inner emotions and cogitations.To the
Lighthouse,have generated the most critical attention and are the most widely
studied of Woolf's novels.
Ø What
is Stream of Consciousness ?
In literature, stream of consciousness
writing is a literary device which seeks to portray an individual's point of
view by giving the written equivalent of the character's thought processes,
either in a loose interior monologue, or in Connection to his or her sensory
reactions to external occurrences. Stream of consciousness writing is strongly
associated with the modernist movement. Its introduction in the literary
context, transferred from psychology.
• Stream of Consciousness is a literary technique
which was pioneered by Dorothy Richardson, Virginia Woolf, and James Joyce.
• ‘Stream of consciousness’ is characterized by a flow
of thoughts and images, which may not always appear to have a coherent
structure or cohesion. The plot line may weave in and out of time and place,
carrying the reader through the life span of a character or further along a
timeline to incorporate the lives (and thoughts) of characters from other time
periods.
Ø ‘ Interior Monologue’
• The
related phrase ‘Interior Monologue’ is used to describe in inner movement of
Consciousness in a character’s mind. A
stylized way of thinking out loud.Unlike stream-of-consciousness, an interior
monologue can be integrated into a third-person narrative. The points of view
of character’s thoughts are woven into authorial description, using their own
language. This is the essential difference between interior monologue and
straight narrative :
Two types of
interior monologues
a.
Indirect Interior Monologue
b.
Direct Interior Monologue
ü
Characters,
Presented Through their Own and through other’s Consciousness
ü
Rejection of
Traditional Technique
ü
The Role of
The Central Intelligence
ü Suspense and Curiosity
ü The Pattern : Conversation and Reaction
ü Sources of Unity
ü Third Person Narration
ü The Completion of The Circle
( Dhara Bhatt)
|
Virginia Woolf saws us a particular person in this
novel not only through the Consciousness of the other persons. The Conventional
novel did not express life adequately. She was of the opinion that life was a
shower of ever failing atoms of experience, and not a narrative line. Life, she
said, was a luminous halo, a semitransparent envelope surrounding us from the
beginning of Consciousness to end.
Virginia Woolf does not put us directly
into the minds of her people all the time. She does depict character through
the inner Consciousness of the Person’swhom we meet in this novel. But she
herself remains the controlling intelligence, speaking in the third person.
While she very seldom slips in Comments ofher own, she remains the narrator,
telling us what is going on in the various minds.
Virginia Woolf Shows us a particular
person in this novel not only through the Consciousness of that person himself
or herself, but also through the Consciousness of the other persons. We are
given the interior monologues of the various characters in this novel, and it
is largely through the twin devices of Stream of Consciousness and the interior
monologue that we come to know the various characters.
Thus, we see Mrs. Ramsay not only
through her own Consciousness but through the Consciousness of Mr. Ramsey, the
child James, Lily Briscoe, Mr. Tinsley,and Mr. Bankes. Similarly we come to
know Mr.Ramsay not only through his own Consciousness but also through the
Consciousness of Mrs.Ramsay, the young James, Lily Briscoe, and Mr. Bankes. In
fact, every character in the novel is presented to us through his own
Consciousness and also through the Consciousness of the other characters. At
the same time, the characters are occasionally presented to us directly by the all-knowing
author of the novel, and also sometimes bits of conversation or dialogue
between the characters.
Ø Rejection of
Traditional Technique
Modernist
writer start the new style of writing and reject the old style of writing and
also we can say that the writer of the novel ‘TotheLighthouse’ by Virginia
Woolf’s start the new way of writing. Mrs. Woolf’s Concern in writing novels
was not merely to narrate a story as the older novelists did, but to discover
and record life as the people feel who live it. Hence it is she rejected the
conventional technique of narration and adopted a new technique more suited to
her purposes. It is for this reason that in ‘To The Lighthouse’ she not told a
story, in the sense of a Series of events, and has Concentrated on a small
number of Characters, whose nature and feelings are represented to us largely
through their interior monologues. In order to capture the inner reality, the
truth about life, she has tried to represent the moving current of life and the
individual’s Consciousness of the fleeting movement, and secondly, also to
select from this current and organize it so that the novel may penetrate
beneath the surface reality and may give to the reader a sense of understanding
and completeness. The interior monologues of the different characters are, no
doubt, given, but the novelist, the central intelligence, is also constantly
busy, organizing the material and illuminating it by frequent Comments.
Mrs.
Woolf’s technique of narration is quite different from that of the “Stream of
Consciousness” novelists. Writers, James Hefley. “Far from being a stream of Consciousness novel,
’To the Lighthouse’ is theobjective account of a central intelligence thatapproaches
and assumes the characters. Consciousness, but does not become completely
identified with any one Consciousness. This central intelligence is thus free
to Comment upon the whole in what seems a completely impersonal manner, as this
short passage shows:‘It is a triumph’ said Mr. Bankes, laying his knife down
for a moment. He had eaten attentively. It was rich; It was tender. It was
perfectly cooked. How did she manage these things in the depths of the country?
He asked her. She was a wonderful woman. All his love, all his reverence, had
returned; And she knew it.” “It is a French recipe of my grandmother’s said
Mrs. Ramsay, Speaking with a ring of great pleasure in her voice. Of course it
was French. What passes for cookery in England is an abominations; It is
pulling cabbages in water. It is roasting meat until it is like leather. It is
cutting off the delicious skins ofvegetables. ’In which’, said Mr. Bankes, “All
the virtue of vegetables is contained.” Here the central
intelligence is reporting a part of the dinner Conversation.
‘To the Lighthouse’ may not have a logical unity, a
logical sequence of Cause and effect, it is have a unity of a higher and
stronger kind i.e. emotional unity. Jean Guiget has considered the point in
detail, and we may be excused for quoting from him at length;
“Lily Briscoe, painting on the lawn, fromtime to time
costs a glance towards the bay to watchthe boat on which Mr. Ramsay, James and
Cam aresailing. But this link is purely eternal; The real unity ofthe sections lies
in the Coincidence of Project andthought me the Completion of Lily’s Canvas,
thefulfillment of James’ plan. It is not so very importantthat Lily sees the
sails fall and Flap; What common istheir common immobility: “Life stands still
here, and“The boat made no motion at all.”
Ø Third
Person Narration
The Third person
narration is a very Common novel device Virginia Woolf is, however, very
careful to mock her direction of the narrative as little noticed as possible.
Her use of direct speech for the interior monologues of her characters makes it
easy for her to work into these mental soliloquies a number of statements and
ideas which are outside the range of knowledge of character she is dealing
with. When, for example, at the beginning, she describes the feelings of James
about his father, she moves from what the child is thinking to what Mrs.Ramsay
habitually did and said, through impersonal sentences:
“Had there been an ate
handy, apoker, or any weapon that would have gashed a holein his father’s
breast and killed him, there and thenJames would have seized it. Such were the
extremesof emotion that Mr. Ramsay excited in his children’sbreasts by his mere
presence: Standing: disillusioning his son and casting ridicule upon his wife,
who was tenthousand times better in every way than he was(James
thought), but also with some secret conceit
athis own accuracy of judgment. What he said was true.It was always true. He was
incapable of untruth; Nevertampered with a fact; Never altered a
disagreeableword to suit the pleasure or convenience of any mortalbeing, least
of all of his own children, who sprung fromhis loins, should be aware from
childhood that life isdifficult…….”
The
statements in the midge here clearly develop from James is thinking, but we seem to move away from the child
himself into a general comment, which, in turn, merges into the description of
Mr. Ramsay’s attitude towards life. Yet we hardly notice the shift because of
the uniformity of style; The two currents of thoughts seem to flow together.
Just as this third person narration makes it possible for Virginia Woolf to
move smoothly from one character to another, so in the novel as a whole it is a
unifying Principle.
Conclusion:-
Thus,
The lighthouse Stream of consciousness is used as unifying factor in the novel.
The action moves on normal Constructional lines from scene to scene andfrom the
mind of one person to that of another. There is very little Complication. These
shifts from one consciousness to another and these movements aremade further
easy by allowing every incident to take place in a close knit homogenous world.
’To The Lighthouse’ is a masterpiece of Construction. It is anorganic whole. It
is a great work of art which fully deserves the Praises that have been lavished
on it.
Woolf has cleverly avoided the drawbacks of
the stream of Consciousness novel, and given form and coherence to her
material. She is not haphazard and incoherent like the other “Stream of Consciousness” novelists. Indeed through her flexible style she fuses
narrative and description of thought, imparts farm and unity, and conveys a
sense of the amazing richness and Complexity of life.
"An Analysis of stream of Consciousness Technique
in To The Lighthouse." Yanxia sang (2010).
Bhatt, Dhara. http://dharabhatt061011.blogspot.in/.
23 11 2011. 30 10 2015
<http://dharabhatt061011.blogspot.in/2011/11/stream-of-consciousness-novel-to.html>.
Good work
ReplyDeleteThis is more brief and quite interesting
https://freebooksummary.com/analysis-of-mr-ramsay-in-woolfs-to-the-lighthouse-98012
Somatic coherence techniques When your website or blog goes live for the first time, it is exciting. That is until you realize no one but you and your.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this amazing technique Special Needs Tutor Scottsdale
ReplyDeleteA well written article about An Analysis of Stream of consciousness Technique Special Needs Tutor Gilbert
ReplyDeleteLove to read this type of informative stuff Private Tutor Bouldin Creek
ReplyDeleteThe analysis is good learned a lot Private tutor Naples
ReplyDeleteYou have done a good analysis Private tutor Tampa
ReplyDelete